<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Linux is Lacking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garrettbartley.com/2006/12/27/what-linux-is-lacking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garrettbartley.com/2006/12/27/what-linux-is-lacking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PhragMunkee</title>
		<link>http://www.garrettbartley.com/2006/12/27/what-linux-is-lacking/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>PhragMunkee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 06:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phragmunkee.com/2006/12/27/what-linux-is-lacking/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>So, why can&#039;t three applications that essentially do the same thing really do the same thing?  Consistency would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, why can&#8217;t three applications that essentially do the same thing really do the same thing?  Consistency would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.garrettbartley.com/2006/12/27/what-linux-is-lacking/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 03:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phragmunkee.com/2006/12/27/what-linux-is-lacking/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and maybe maintaining a relational database of what dependencies get installed with certain apps, so when I remove an app, its dependencies are also removed if nothing else requires them. It only makes sense. &quot;

Use aptitude when installing a program. It will automatically remove unused dependencies if you use aptitude to remove also (If you used synaptic or apt-get when installing then aptitude won&#039;t know though).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and maybe maintaining a relational database of what dependencies get installed with certain apps, so when I remove an app, its dependencies are also removed if nothing else requires them. It only makes sense. &#8221;</p>
<p>Use aptitude when installing a program. It will automatically remove unused dependencies if you use aptitude to remove also (If you used synaptic or apt-get when installing then aptitude won&#8217;t know though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhragMunkee</title>
		<link>http://www.garrettbartley.com/2006/12/27/what-linux-is-lacking/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>PhragMunkee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phragmunkee.com/2006/12/27/what-linux-is-lacking/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>You know, it&#039;d also be nice to specify where icons are put in the Applications menu when installed.  But that&#039;s minimal compared to the rants above.  Ubuntu does a pretty good job of it for me, but I still like having that little bit of control.

Oh, and maybe maintaining a relational database of what dependencies get installed with certain apps, so when I remove an app, its dependencies are also removed if nothing else requires them.  It only makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it&#8217;d also be nice to specify where icons are put in the Applications menu when installed.  But that&#8217;s minimal compared to the rants above.  Ubuntu does a pretty good job of it for me, but I still like having that little bit of control.</p>
<p>Oh, and maybe maintaining a relational database of what dependencies get installed with certain apps, so when I remove an app, its dependencies are also removed if nothing else requires them.  It only makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
